HEAD-TO-HEAD · UPDATED 13 OCTOBER 2026 · EDITORIAL ASSESSMENT
Artemis vs Prophet Security
Cyber AI Comparison team · Based on vendor websites, docs and funding announcements, last checked October 2026
What to know
Artemis scores higher than Prophet Security on our SOAR replacement weights, 7.10 to 7.00. Artemis leads on human-in-the-loop controls and transition effort from SOAR, Prophet Security leads on explainability, deployment options and pricing transparency, and they tie on investigation depth and alert source coverage. Artemis is positioned to replace SOAR; Prophet Security is positioned to replace SOAR.
Artemis Security
7.10 / 10
Prophet Security
7.00 / 10
How do Artemis and Prophet Security compare criterion by criterion?
| Criterion | Weight | Artemis Security | Prophet Security | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Investigation depth per alert | 20% | 8 | 8 | Tie |
| Explainability of verdicts | 15% | 7 | 8 | Prophet Security |
| Coverage of alert sources | 15% | 8 | 8 | Tie |
| Human-in-the-loop controls | 15% | 9 | 8 | Artemis Security |
| Transition effort from an existing SOAR | 15% | 8 | 6 | Artemis Security |
| Deployment model options | 10% | 5 | 6 | Prophet Security |
| Pricing transparency | 10% | 2 | 3 | Prophet Security |
| Weighted score | 100% | 7.10 | 7.00 | Artemis Security |
Artemis leads on 2 criteria, Prophet Security on 3, tied on 2.
Where does each one win?
Artemis leads on
- Human-in-the-loop controls: 9 vs 8. Acts alone only where pre-authorised, with approval set per action and per connector, impact-checked containment that is reversible by design, and a who, what and why audit trail.
- Transition effort from an existing SOAR: 8 vs 6. An AI-native SOAR builder (visual and natural language) aimed at teams maintaining a SOAR, 300+ actions, a Splunk SOAR connector and automatic playbook update proposals; existing playbooks are rebuilt rather than translated.
Prophet Security leads on
- Explainability of verdicts: 7 vs 8. Delivers determinations Prophet says you can audit, following the questions a human analyst would ask.
- Deployment model options: 5 vs 6. Single-tenant, customer data in individual datastores, bring-your-own-key option; runs on AWS with no on-premises option described.
- Pricing transparency: 2 vs 3. No pricing is published; Prophet's AWS Marketplace listing refers buyers to Prophet for pricing.
How does pricing compare?
| Fact | Artemis Security | Prophet Security |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing basis (published) | Not published. | Not published. |
| Pricing unit | Not published | Not published |
| Cost | Not published, contact sales | Not published, contact sales |
Source: artemissecurity.com · prophetsecurity.ai · Reviewed Sep 2026
Facts side by side
| Fact | Artemis Security | Prophet Security |
|---|---|---|
| Stance | Replaces SOAR | Replaces SOAR |
| Integrations | 225+ | 200+ |
| Deployment | Not published (on-prem action execution described) | Single-tenant on AWS; BYOK |
| Pricing | Not published | Not published |
| Autonomy/response | Case-specific actions such as revoking sessions, isolating a host, disabling an inbox rule or blocking a domain, each with an impact preview and evidence; "300+ actions across CrowdStrike, SentinelOne, Okta, Entra, Microsoft 365, Cloudflare, Palo Alto, GitHub, Jira and ServiceNow". | "Scoped Agent Actions, autonomously or with your sign-off". |
Source: artemissecurity.com · artemissecurity.com/platform/overview · artemissecurity.com/platform/response · artemissecurity.com/connectors · Artemis Security funding announcement · Reviewed Sep 2026
Source: prophetsecurity.ai · prophetsecurity.ai/security · Reviewed Sep 2026
Which should you choose?
Choose Artemis if transition effort from SOAR and human-in-the-loop controls matter most. An AI-native SOAR builder (visual and natural language) aimed at teams maintaining a SOAR, 300+ actions, a Splunk SOAR connector and automatic playbook update proposals; existing playbooks are rebuilt rather than translated. Acts alone only where pre-authorised, with approval set per action and per connector, impact-checked containment that is reversible by design, and a who, what and why audit trail.
Choose Prophet Security if explainability and deployment options matter most. Delivers determinations Prophet says you can audit, following the questions a human analyst would ask. Single-tenant, customer data in individual datastores, bring-your-own-key option; runs on AWS with no on-premises option described.
Frequently asked questions
Which scores higher, Artemis or Prophet Security?
Artemis scores 7.10 and Prophet Security 7.00 on our SOAR replacement rubric (editorial assessment, 0–10).
Do Artemis and Prophet Security replace SOAR?
Artemis's published stance: Replaces SOAR. Prophet Security's published stance: Replaces SOAR. See the SOAR Stance Index.
Do Artemis and Prophet Security publish pricing?
Artemis: Not published. Prophet Security: Not published.