HEAD-TO-HEAD · UPDATED 13 OCTOBER 2026 · EDITORIAL ASSESSMENT
Artemis vs Tines
Cyber AI Comparison team · Based on vendor websites, docs and funding announcements, last checked October 2026
What to know
Artemis scores higher than Tines on our SOAR replacement weights, 7.10 to 6.85. Artemis leads on investigation depth, explainability, alert source coverage and human-in-the-loop controls, Tines leads on deployment options and pricing transparency, and they tie on transition effort from SOAR. Artemis is positioned to replace SOAR; Tines is positioned to replace SOAR.
Artemis Security
7.10 / 10
Tines
6.85 / 10
How do Artemis and Tines compare criterion by criterion?
| Criterion | Weight | Artemis Security | Tines | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Investigation depth per alert | 20% | 8 | 6 | Artemis Security |
| Explainability of verdicts | 15% | 7 | 6 | Artemis Security |
| Coverage of alert sources | 15% | 8 | 7 | Artemis Security |
| Human-in-the-loop controls | 15% | 9 | 8 | Artemis Security |
| Transition effort from an existing SOAR | 15% | 8 | 8 | Tie |
| Deployment model options | 10% | 5 | 9 | Tines |
| Pricing transparency | 10% | 2 | 4 | Tines |
| Weighted score | 100% | 7.10 | 6.85 | Artemis Security |
Artemis leads on 4 criteria, Tines on 2, tied on 1.
Where does each one win?
Artemis leads on
- Investigation depth per alert: 8 vs 6. Correlates identity, cloud, endpoint and SaaS data against a living model of the environment and investigates autonomously; its Cursor case cites 96% of investigations resolved autonomously (Artemis's figure).
- Explainability of verdicts: 7 vs 6. Investigations and proposed actions come with evidence and an impact preview, and an audit trail records who, what and why; step-level agent reasoning is less documented.
- Coverage of alert sources: 8 vs 7. 225+ connectors, including SIEMs it ingests (Splunk, Microsoft Sentinel, CrowdStrike NG-SIEM) and data stores it queries in place (Snowflake, BigQuery, AWS Security Lake).
- Human-in-the-loop controls: 9 vs 8. Acts alone only where pre-authorised, with approval set per action and per connector, impact-checked containment that is reversible by design, and a who, what and why audit trail.
Tines leads on
- Deployment model options: 5 vs 9. Shared stack, self-hosted or hybrid, with AI features available wherever Tines is deployed and AI described as geo-bound and tenant-scoped.
- Pricing transparency: 2 vs 4. A free edition with published limits (3 live workflows, a one-time $50 AI allowance); paid editions have no public price.
How does pricing compare?
| Fact | Artemis Security | Tines |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing basis (published) | Not published. | Free edition: unlimited users and connectors, 3 live workflows, one-time $50 AI allowance. Paid editions: contact sales. |
| Pricing unit | Not published | Not published |
| Cost | Not published, contact sales | Not published, contact sales |
Source: artemissecurity.com · tines.com/pricing · Reviewed Sep 2026
Facts side by side
| Fact | Artemis Security | Tines |
|---|---|---|
| Stance | Replaces SOAR | Replaces SOAR |
| Integrations | 225+ | Any API; count not published |
| Deployment | Not published (on-prem action execution described) | Shared, self-hosted or hybrid |
| Pricing | Not published | Free edition; paid not published |
| Autonomy/response | Case-specific actions such as revoking sessions, isolating a host, disabling an inbox rule or blocking a domain, each with an impact preview and evidence; "300+ actions across CrowdStrike, SentinelOne, Okta, Entra, Microsoft 365, Cloudflare, Palo Alto, GitHub, Jira and ServiceNow". | Create case, escalate, reset password, suspend departing-user accounts in Gmail, Okta and Slack, alert response with CrowdStrike and SentinelOne. |
Source: artemissecurity.com · artemissecurity.com/platform/overview · artemissecurity.com/platform/response · artemissecurity.com/connectors · Artemis Security funding announcement · Reviewed Sep 2026
Source: tines.com · tines.com/solutions/security/ai-soc · tines.com/solutions/security/soar · tines.com/stories/agents · tines.com/ai-in-tines · tines.com/pricing · tines.com/blog/series-c-fundraise · Reviewed Sep 2026
Which should you choose?
Choose Artemis if investigation depth and explainability matter most. Correlates identity, cloud, endpoint and SaaS data against a living model of the environment and investigates autonomously; its Cursor case cites 96% of investigations resolved autonomously (Artemis's figure). Investigations and proposed actions come with evidence and an impact preview, and an audit trail records who, what and why; step-level agent reasoning is less documented.
Choose Tines if deployment options and pricing transparency matter most. Shared stack, self-hosted or hybrid, with AI features available wherever Tines is deployed and AI described as geo-bound and tenant-scoped. A free edition with published limits (3 live workflows, a one-time $50 AI allowance); paid editions have no public price.
Frequently asked questions
Which scores higher, Artemis or Tines?
Artemis scores 7.10 and Tines 6.85 on our SOAR replacement rubric (editorial assessment, 0–10).
Do Artemis and Tines replace SOAR?
Artemis's published stance: Replaces SOAR. Tines's published stance: Replaces SOAR. See the SOAR Stance Index.
Do Artemis and Tines publish pricing?
Artemis: Not published. Tines: Free edition: unlimited users and connectors, 3 live workflows, one-time $50 AI allowance. Paid editions: contact sales.