HEAD-TO-HEAD · UPDATED 13 OCTOBER 2026 · EDITORIAL ASSESSMENT
Intezer vs Tines
Cyber AI Comparison team · Based on vendor websites, docs and funding announcements, last checked October 2026
What to know
Tines scores higher than Intezer on our SOAR replacement weights, 6.85 to 6.25. Intezer leads on investigation depth, explainability and pricing transparency, Tines leads on human-in-the-loop controls, transition effort from SOAR and deployment options, and they tie on alert source coverage. Intezer is built to work alongside a SOAR; Tines is positioned to replace SOAR.
Intezer
6.25 / 10
Tines
6.85 / 10
How do Intezer and Tines compare criterion by criterion?
| Criterion | Weight | Intezer | Tines | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Investigation depth per alert | 20% | 8 | 6 | Intezer |
| Explainability of verdicts | 15% | 7 | 6 | Intezer |
| Coverage of alert sources | 15% | 7 | 7 | Tie |
| Human-in-the-loop controls | 15% | 6 | 8 | Tines |
| Transition effort from an existing SOAR | 15% | 5 | 8 | Tines |
| Deployment model options | 10% | 4 | 9 | Tines |
| Pricing transparency | 10% | 5 | 4 | Intezer |
| Weighted score | 100% | 6.25 | 6.85 | Tines |
Intezer leads on 3 criteria, Tines on 3, tied on 1.
Where does each one win?
Intezer leads on
- Investigation depth per alert: 8 vs 6. Forensic depth on alerts: endpoint analysis, memory scanning, reverse engineering and built-in threat intelligence, including low-severity alerts.
- Explainability of verdicts: 7 vs 6. Customers can challenge any verdict in the platform; incidents include tailored remediation plans.
- Pricing transparency: 5 vs 4. Publishes two tiers (Starter, one alert source; Complete, all alert sources) priced by endpoints with no volume fees, but no prices.
Tines leads on
- Human-in-the-loop controls: 6 vs 8. Fully autonomous, deterministic or human-in-the-loop modes, approvals and built-in oversight, and you control what goes live.
- Transition effort from an existing SOAR: 5 vs 8. Positions itself as a modern SOAR against legacy SOAR platforms, with no-code and natural-language building and agentic plus deterministic steps; playbooks are rebuilt rather than translated.
- Deployment model options: 4 vs 9. Shared stack, self-hosted or hybrid, with AI features available wherever Tines is deployed and AI described as geo-bound and tenant-scoped.
How does pricing compare?
| Fact | Intezer | Tines |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing basis (published) | Starter (one alert source) and Complete (all alert sources) tiers, both priced by endpoints with no volume fees. Prices: contact sales. | Free edition: unlimited users and connectors, 3 live workflows, one-time $50 AI allowance. Paid editions: contact sales. |
| Pricing unit | Endpoints | Not published |
| Cost | Not published, contact sales | Not published, contact sales |
Source: intezer.com/pricing · tines.com/pricing · Reviewed Sep 2026
Facts side by side
| Fact | Intezer | Tines |
|---|---|---|
| Stance | Works alongside SOAR | Replaces SOAR |
| Integrations | 100+ | Any API; count not published |
| Deployment | Not published | Shared, self-hosted or hybrid |
| Pricing | Priced by endpoints, no prices | Free edition; paid not published |
| Autonomy/response | Tailored remediation plans, executed automatically or manually; routing to SOAR and ticketing systems. | Create case, escalate, reset password, suspend departing-user accounts in Gmail, Okta and Slack, alert response with CrowdStrike and SentinelOne. |
Source: intezer.com · intezer.com/pricing · Reviewed Sep 2026
Source: tines.com · tines.com/solutions/security/ai-soc · tines.com/solutions/security/soar · tines.com/stories/agents · tines.com/ai-in-tines · tines.com/pricing · tines.com/blog/series-c-fundraise · Reviewed Sep 2026
Which should you choose?
Choose Intezer if investigation depth and explainability matter most. Forensic depth on alerts: endpoint analysis, memory scanning, reverse engineering and built-in threat intelligence, including low-severity alerts. Customers can challenge any verdict in the platform; incidents include tailored remediation plans.
Choose Tines if deployment options and transition effort from SOAR matter most. Shared stack, self-hosted or hybrid, with AI features available wherever Tines is deployed and AI described as geo-bound and tenant-scoped. Positions itself as a modern SOAR against legacy SOAR platforms, with no-code and natural-language building and agentic plus deterministic steps; playbooks are rebuilt rather than translated.
Frequently asked questions
Which scores higher, Intezer or Tines?
Tines scores 6.85 and Intezer 6.25 on our SOAR replacement rubric (editorial assessment, 0–10).
Do Intezer and Tines replace SOAR?
Intezer's published stance: Works alongside SOAR. Tines's published stance: Replaces SOAR. See the SOAR Stance Index.
Do Intezer and Tines publish pricing?
Intezer: Starter (one alert source) and Complete (all alert sources) tiers, both priced by endpoints with no volume fees. Prices: contact sales. Tines: Free edition: unlimited users and connectors, 3 live workflows, one-time $50 AI allowance. Paid editions: contact sales.