HEAD-TO-HEAD · UPDATED 13 OCTOBER 2026 · EDITORIAL ASSESSMENT
Prophet Security vs Tines
Cyber AI Comparison team · Based on vendor websites, docs and funding announcements, last checked October 2026
What to know
Prophet Security scores higher than Tines on our SOAR replacement weights, 7.00 to 6.85. Prophet Security leads on investigation depth, explainability and alert source coverage, Tines leads on transition effort from SOAR, deployment options and pricing transparency, and they tie on human-in-the-loop controls. Prophet Security is positioned to replace SOAR; Tines is positioned to replace SOAR.
Prophet Security
7.00 / 10
Tines
6.85 / 10
How do Prophet Security and Tines compare criterion by criterion?
| Criterion | Weight | Prophet Security | Tines | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Investigation depth per alert | 20% | 8 | 6 | Prophet Security |
| Explainability of verdicts | 15% | 8 | 6 | Prophet Security |
| Coverage of alert sources | 15% | 8 | 7 | Prophet Security |
| Human-in-the-loop controls | 15% | 8 | 8 | Tie |
| Transition effort from an existing SOAR | 15% | 6 | 8 | Tines |
| Deployment model options | 10% | 6 | 9 | Tines |
| Pricing transparency | 10% | 3 | 4 | Tines |
| Weighted score | 100% | 7.00 | 6.85 | Prophet Security |
Prophet Security leads on 3 criteria, Tines on 3, tied on 1.
Where does each one win?
Prophet Security leads on
- Investigation depth per alert: 8 vs 6. The AI SOC Analyst triages and investigates with what Prophet calls senior-analyst depth, alongside AI threat hunting and detection engineering agents.
- Explainability of verdicts: 8 vs 6. Delivers determinations Prophet says you can audit, following the questions a human analyst would ask.
- Coverage of alert sources: 8 vs 7. 200+ out-of-the-box integrations.
Tines leads on
- Transition effort from an existing SOAR: 6 vs 8. Positions itself as a modern SOAR against legacy SOAR platforms, with no-code and natural-language building and agentic plus deterministic steps; playbooks are rebuilt rather than translated.
- Deployment model options: 6 vs 9. Shared stack, self-hosted or hybrid, with AI features available wherever Tines is deployed and AI described as geo-bound and tenant-scoped.
- Pricing transparency: 3 vs 4. A free edition with published limits (3 live workflows, a one-time $50 AI allowance); paid editions have no public price.
How does pricing compare?
| Fact | Prophet Security | Tines |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing basis (published) | Not published. | Free edition: unlimited users and connectors, 3 live workflows, one-time $50 AI allowance. Paid editions: contact sales. |
| Pricing unit | Not published | Not published |
| Cost | Not published, contact sales | Not published, contact sales |
Source: prophetsecurity.ai · tines.com/pricing · Reviewed Sep 2026
Facts side by side
| Fact | Prophet Security | Tines |
|---|---|---|
| Stance | Replaces SOAR | Replaces SOAR |
| Integrations | 200+ | Any API; count not published |
| Deployment | Single-tenant on AWS; BYOK | Shared, self-hosted or hybrid |
| Pricing | Not published | Free edition; paid not published |
| Autonomy/response | "Scoped Agent Actions, autonomously or with your sign-off". | Create case, escalate, reset password, suspend departing-user accounts in Gmail, Okta and Slack, alert response with CrowdStrike and SentinelOne. |
Source: prophetsecurity.ai · prophetsecurity.ai/security · Reviewed Sep 2026
Source: tines.com · tines.com/solutions/security/ai-soc · tines.com/solutions/security/soar · tines.com/stories/agents · tines.com/ai-in-tines · tines.com/pricing · tines.com/blog/series-c-fundraise · Reviewed Sep 2026
Which should you choose?
Choose Prophet Security if investigation depth and explainability matter most. The AI SOC Analyst triages and investigates with what Prophet calls senior-analyst depth, alongside AI threat hunting and detection engineering agents. Delivers determinations Prophet says you can audit, following the questions a human analyst would ask.
Choose Tines if deployment options and transition effort from SOAR matter most. Shared stack, self-hosted or hybrid, with AI features available wherever Tines is deployed and AI described as geo-bound and tenant-scoped. Positions itself as a modern SOAR against legacy SOAR platforms, with no-code and natural-language building and agentic plus deterministic steps; playbooks are rebuilt rather than translated.
Frequently asked questions
Which scores higher, Prophet Security or Tines?
Prophet Security scores 7.00 and Tines 6.85 on our SOAR replacement rubric (editorial assessment, 0–10).
Do Prophet Security and Tines replace SOAR?
Prophet Security's published stance: Replaces SOAR. Tines's published stance: Replaces SOAR. See the SOAR Stance Index.
Do Prophet Security and Tines publish pricing?
Prophet Security: Not published. Tines: Free edition: unlimited users and connectors, 3 live workflows, one-time $50 AI allowance. Paid editions: contact sales.