Cyber AI Comparison

HEAD-TO-HEAD · UPDATED 13 OCTOBER 2026 · EDITORIAL ASSESSMENT

Tines vs Torq

Cyber AI Comparison team · Based on vendor websites, docs and funding announcements, last checked October 2026

What to know

Torq scores higher than Tines on our SOAR replacement weights, 7.10 to 6.85. Tines leads on deployment options and pricing transparency, Torq leads on investigation depth, explainability and alert source coverage, and they tie on human-in-the-loop controls and transition effort from SOAR. Tines is positioned to replace SOAR; Torq is positioned to replace SOAR.

Tines

6.85 / 10

Best for self-hosting and building your own AI SOC workflowsReplaces SOAR

Read the Tines review

Torq AI SOC Platform

7.10 / 10

Best for teams that want AI agents plus no-code automationReplaces SOAR

Read the Torq AI SOC Platform review

How do Tines and Torq compare criterion by criterion?

SOAR replacement fit by criterion (editorial assessment, 0–10)
CriterionWeightTinesTorq AI SOC PlatformEdge
Investigation depth per alert20%68Torq AI SOC Platform
Explainability of verdicts15%67Torq AI SOC Platform
Coverage of alert sources15%79Torq AI SOC Platform
Human-in-the-loop controls15%88Tie
Transition effort from an existing SOAR15%88Tie
Deployment model options10%95Tines
Pricing transparency10%42Tines
Weighted score100%6.857.10Torq AI SOC Platform

Tines leads on 2 criteria, Torq on 3, tied on 2.

Where does each one win?

Tines leads on

  • Deployment model options: 9 vs 5. Shared stack, self-hosted or hybrid, with AI features available wherever Tines is deployed and AI described as geo-bound and tenant-scoped.
  • Pricing transparency: 4 vs 2. A free edition with published limits (3 live workflows, a one-time $50 AI allowance); paid editions have no public price.

Torq leads on

  • Investigation depth per alert: 6 vs 8. Socrates coordinates specialised HyperAgents that gather evidence, assemble timelines and summarise findings per case.
  • Explainability of verdicts: 6 vs 7. Cases carry evidence, timelines and summaries, and Torq stresses transparency, but step-level agent reasoning is less documented publicly than at the leaders.
  • Coverage of alert sources: 7 vs 9. 300 pre-built integrations and 4,000+ pre-built steps, plus AI-generated integrations.

How does pricing compare?

FactTinesTorq AI SOC Platform
Pricing basis (published)Free edition: unlimited users and connectors, 3 live workflows, one-time $50 AI allowance. Paid editions: contact sales.Not published. torq.io/pricing returned a 404 when we checked.
Pricing unitNot publishedNot published
CostNot published, contact salesNot published, contact sales

Source: tines.com/pricing · torq.io/ai-soc-platform · Reviewed Sep 2026

Facts side by side

FactTinesTorq AI SOC Platform
StanceReplaces SOARReplaces SOAR
IntegrationsAny API; count not published300 integrations, 4,000+ steps
DeploymentShared, self-hosted or hybridCloud-native
PricingFree edition; paid not publishedNot published
Autonomy/responseCreate case, escalate, reset password, suspend departing-user accounts in Gmail, Okta and Slack, alert response with CrowdStrike and SentinelOne.Torq says it can "Close Over 90% of Security Cases. Autonomously." (Torq's claim).

Source: tines.com · tines.com/solutions/security/ai-soc · tines.com/solutions/security/soar · tines.com/stories/agents · tines.com/ai-in-tines · tines.com/pricing · tines.com/blog/series-c-fundraise · Reviewed Sep 2026

Source: torq.io/ai-soc-platform · torq.io/hyperautomation · torq.io/blog/soar-is-dead · torq.io/news · torq.io · Reviewed Sep 2026

Which should you choose?

Choose Tines if deployment options and pricing transparency matter most. Shared stack, self-hosted or hybrid, with AI features available wherever Tines is deployed and AI described as geo-bound and tenant-scoped. A free edition with published limits (3 live workflows, a one-time $50 AI allowance); paid editions have no public price.

Choose Torq if investigation depth and alert source coverage matter most. Socrates coordinates specialised HyperAgents that gather evidence, assemble timelines and summarise findings per case. 300 pre-built integrations and 4,000+ pre-built steps, plus AI-generated integrations.

Frequently asked questions

Which scores higher, Tines or Torq?

Torq scores 7.10 and Tines 6.85 on our SOAR replacement rubric (editorial assessment, 0–10).

Do Tines and Torq replace SOAR?

Tines's published stance: Replaces SOAR. Torq's published stance: Replaces SOAR. See the SOAR Stance Index.

Do Tines and Torq publish pricing?

Tines: Free edition: unlimited users and connectors, 3 live workflows, one-time $50 AI allowance. Paid editions: contact sales. Torq: Not published. torq.io/pricing returned a 404 when we checked.

Related on this site