HEAD-TO-HEAD · UPDATED 13 OCTOBER 2026 · EDITORIAL ASSESSMENT
Artemis vs Mate Security
Cyber AI Comparison team · Based on vendor websites, docs and funding announcements, last checked October 2026
What to know
Mate Security scores higher than Artemis on our SOAR replacement weights, 7.80 to 7.10. Artemis leads on alert source coverage, Mate Security leads on investigation depth, explainability, transition effort from SOAR and pricing transparency, and they tie on human-in-the-loop controls and deployment options. Artemis is positioned to replace SOAR; Mate Security is positioned to replace SOAR.
Artemis Security
7.10 / 10
Mate Security
7.80 / 10
How do Artemis and Mate Security compare criterion by criterion?
| Criterion | Weight | Artemis Security | Mate Security | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Investigation depth per alert | 20% | 8 | 9 | Mate Security |
| Explainability of verdicts | 15% | 7 | 9 | Mate Security |
| Coverage of alert sources | 15% | 8 | 7 | Artemis Security |
| Human-in-the-loop controls | 15% | 9 | 9 | Tie |
| Transition effort from an existing SOAR | 15% | 8 | 9 | Mate Security |
| Deployment model options | 10% | 5 | 5 | Tie |
| Pricing transparency | 10% | 2 | 4 | Mate Security |
| Weighted score | 100% | 7.10 | 7.80 | Mate Security |
Artemis leads on 1 criteria, Mate Security on 4, tied on 2.
Where Mate Security loses in this comparison
- Coverage of alert sources: Mate Security 7, Artemis Security 8
Where does each one win?
Artemis leads on
- Coverage of alert sources: 8 vs 7. 225+ connectors, including SIEMs it ingests (Splunk, Microsoft Sentinel, CrowdStrike NG-SIEM) and data stores it queries in place (Snowflake, BigQuery, AWS Security Lake).
Mate Security leads on
- Investigation depth per alert: 8 vs 9. Investigates each alert against its Security Context Graph of memories, decision traces, guardrails and architecture, with domain logic for cloud, insider, email, endpoint, identity and phishing alerts.
- Explainability of verdicts: 7 vs 9. Verdicts come with an evidence trail the team can audit and tune, and decision traces record why analysts decided what they did.
- Transition effort from an existing SOAR: 8 vs 9. States it translates existing SOAR playbooks into Gamebooks, replacing brittle API calls while keeping custom logic; the Gamebooks page is built around the SOAR comparison.
- Pricing transparency: 2 vs 4. No price page on Mate's own site; its AWS Marketplace listing shows $150,000 per 12-month contract for the "Mate Enterprise Tier", a usage tier the listing does not define.
How does pricing compare?
| Fact | Artemis Security | Mate Security |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing basis (published) | Not published. | No price page on Mate's site. AWS Marketplace lists $150,000 per 12-month contract for the Mate Enterprise Tier (usage tier not defined); private offers on request. |
| Pricing unit | Not published | Not published |
| Cost | Not published, contact sales | Not published, contact sales |
Source: artemissecurity.com · AWS Marketplace: Mate Security · Reviewed Sep 2026
Facts side by side
| Fact | Artemis Security | Mate Security |
|---|---|---|
| Stance | Replaces SOAR | Replaces SOAR |
| Integrations | 225+ | Not published |
| Deployment | Not published (on-prem action execution described) | SaaS. Mate says it is built on AWS infrastructure and sells through AWS Marketplace; its trust center lists Amazon Web Services and Google Cloud as cloud subprocessors. Self-hosted, customer-tenant and data residency options: not described. |
| Pricing | Not published | AWS Marketplace $150,000 / 12 months |
| Autonomy/response | Case-specific actions such as revoking sessions, isolating a host, disabling an inbox rule or blocking a domain, each with an impact preview and evidence; "300+ actions across CrowdStrike, SentinelOne, Okta, Entra, Microsoft 365, Cloudflare, Palo Alto, GitHub, Jira and ServiceNow". | Recommend only; Supervised (low-risk steps run, risky changes need approval); Auto-run for trusted categories under guardrails and audit. |
Source: artemissecurity.com · artemissecurity.com/platform/overview · artemissecurity.com/platform/response · artemissecurity.com/connectors · Artemis Security funding announcement · Reviewed Sep 2026
Source: mate.security · mate.security/platform · mate.security/platform/gamebooks · mate.security/blog/introducing-gamebooks-can-you-script-the-whole-game · mate.security/blog/mate-security-now-available-on-aws-marketplace · mate.security/about · mate.security/newsroom · AWS Marketplace: Mate Security · Reviewed Sep 2026
Which should you choose?
Choose Artemis if alert source coverage and human-in-the-loop controls matter most. 225+ connectors, including SIEMs it ingests (Splunk, Microsoft Sentinel, CrowdStrike NG-SIEM) and data stores it queries in place (Snowflake, BigQuery, AWS Security Lake). Acts alone only where pre-authorised, with approval set per action and per connector, impact-checked containment that is reversible by design, and a who, what and why audit trail.
Choose Mate Security if explainability and pricing transparency matter most. Verdicts come with an evidence trail the team can audit and tune, and decision traces record why analysts decided what they did. No price page on Mate's own site; its AWS Marketplace listing shows $150,000 per 12-month contract for the "Mate Enterprise Tier", a usage tier the listing does not define.
Frequently asked questions
Which scores higher, Artemis or Mate Security?
Mate Security scores 7.80 and Artemis 7.10 on our SOAR replacement rubric (editorial assessment, 0–10).
Do Artemis and Mate Security replace SOAR?
Artemis's published stance: Replaces SOAR. Mate Security's published stance: Replaces SOAR. See the SOAR Stance Index.
Do Artemis and Mate Security publish pricing?
Artemis: Not published. Mate Security: No price page on Mate's site. AWS Marketplace lists $150,000 per 12-month contract for the Mate Enterprise Tier (usage tier not defined); private offers on request.