Cyber AI Comparison

ALTERNATIVES · UPDATED 13 OCTOBER 2026 · EDITORIAL ASSESSMENT

Mate Security alternatives (2026)

Cyber AI Comparison team · Last checked September 2026 · Editorial assessment

What to know

On our SOAR replacement rubric, the highest-scoring alternatives to Mate Security (7.80) are Cortex XSOAR (7.25), Artemis Security (7.10) and Torq AI SOC Platform (7.10). None of the 11 alternatives scores higher than Mate Security overall, but several lead it on individual criteria.

Why do teams look for Mate Security alternatives?

These points come from Mate Security's public pages as we read them in September 2026, not from user complaints.

  • No price page on Mate's own site; its AWS Marketplace listing shows $150,000 per 12-month contract for a usage tier the listing does not define.
  • Deployment: SaaS. Mate says it is built on AWS infrastructure and sells through AWS Marketplace; its trust center lists Amazon Web Services and Google Cloud as cloud subprocessors. Self-hosted, customer-tenant and data residency options: not described.
  • It names integrations such as Microsoft, Google Workspace, CrowdStrike, SentinelOne, Proofpoint and Slack but publishes no integration count or full catalogue.

Where Mate Security scores lowest

  • Pricing transparency: 4
  • Deployment model options: 5

Which Mate Security alternatives score highest?

  1. #1

    Cortex XSOAR

    Incumbent SOAR
    Baseline: the largest integration marketplace, now adding agents in place

    7.25 / 10

    Evolves the SOAR in place

    Beats Mate Security on: alert source coverage 10 vs 7 and deployment options 9 vs 5

    Mate Security stays ahead on: investigation depth 9 vs 6, explainability 9 vs 6, human-in-the-loop controls 9 vs 8 and pricing transparency 4 vs 2

    Cortex XSOAR vs Mate SecurityRead the review

  2. #2 (tie)

    Artemis Security

    AI SOC platform
    Best for per-action approval control over AI response

    7.10 / 10

    Replaces SOAR

    Beats Mate Security on: alert source coverage 8 vs 7

    Mate Security stays ahead on: investigation depth 9 vs 8, explainability 9 vs 7, transition effort from SOAR 9 vs 8 and pricing transparency 4 vs 2

    Artemis vs Mate SecurityRead the review

  3. #2 (tie)

    Torq AI SOC Platform

    AI SOC platform
    Best for teams that want AI agents plus no-code automation

    7.10 / 10

    Replaces SOAR

    Beats Mate Security on: alert source coverage 9 vs 7

    Mate Security stays ahead on: investigation depth 9 vs 8, explainability 9 vs 7, human-in-the-loop controls 9 vs 8, transition effort from SOAR 9 vs 8 and pricing transparency 4 vs 2

    Torq vs Mate SecurityRead the review

  4. #4 (tie)

    Dropzone AI

    AI SOC platform
    Best for adding AI investigation while keeping your SOAR

    7.00 / 10

    Works alongside SOAR

    Beats Mate Security on: alert source coverage 8 vs 7, deployment options 7 vs 5 and pricing transparency 5 vs 4

    Mate Security stays ahead on: investigation depth 9 vs 8, explainability 9 vs 8, human-in-the-loop controls 9 vs 6 and transition effort from SOAR 9 vs 6

    Dropzone AI vs Mate SecurityRead the review

  5. #4 (tie)

    Prophet Security

    AI SOC platform
    Best for AI triage with an optional human review service

    7.00 / 10

    Replaces SOAR

    Beats Mate Security on: alert source coverage 8 vs 7 and deployment options 6 vs 5

    Mate Security stays ahead on: investigation depth 9 vs 8, explainability 9 vs 8, human-in-the-loop controls 9 vs 8, transition effort from SOAR 9 vs 6 and pricing transparency 4 vs 3

    Prophet Security vs Mate SecurityRead the review

  6. #6

    Exaforce

    AI SOC platform
    Best for an AI SOC you can run yourself or have managed

    6.90 / 10

    Replaces SOAR

    Beats Mate Security on: alert source coverage 8 vs 7

    Mate Security stays ahead on: investigation depth 9 vs 8, explainability 9 vs 6, human-in-the-loop controls 9 vs 8, transition effort from SOAR 9 vs 8 and deployment options 5 vs 4

    Exaforce vs Mate SecurityRead the review

  7. #7

    Tines

    AI SOC platform
    Best for self-hosting and building your own AI SOC workflows

    6.85 / 10

    Replaces SOAR

    Beats Mate Security on: deployment options 9 vs 5

    Mate Security stays ahead on: investigation depth 9 vs 6, explainability 9 vs 6, human-in-the-loop controls 9 vs 8 and transition effort from SOAR 9 vs 8

    Tines vs Mate SecurityRead the review

  8. #8

    7AI

    AI SOC platform
    Best for step-by-step readable investigations

    6.75 / 10

    Works alongside SOAR

    Does not beat Mate Security on any criterion.

    Mate Security stays ahead on: investigation depth 9 vs 8, alert source coverage 7 vs 6, human-in-the-loop controls 9 vs 8, transition effort from SOAR 9 vs 6 and deployment options 5 vs 4

    7AI vs Mate SecurityRead the review

  9. #9

    Splunk SOAR

    Incumbent SOAR
    Baseline: SOAR inside Splunk Enterprise Security

    6.55 / 10

    Evolves the SOAR in place

    Beats Mate Security on: alert source coverage 9 vs 7 and deployment options 9 vs 5

    Mate Security stays ahead on: investigation depth 9 vs 5, explainability 9 vs 5, human-in-the-loop controls 9 vs 7, transition effort from SOAR 9 vs 8 and pricing transparency 4 vs 3

    Splunk SOAR vs Mate SecurityRead the review

  10. #10

    Conifers CognitiveSOC

    AI SOC platform
    Best for MSSPs and Azure-tenant deployment

    6.45 / 10

    Replaces SOAR

    Beats Mate Security on: deployment options 8 vs 5

    Mate Security stays ahead on: investigation depth 9 vs 7, explainability 9 vs 6, human-in-the-loop controls 9 vs 8, transition effort from SOAR 9 vs 6 and pricing transparency 4 vs 2

    Conifers vs Mate SecurityRead the review

  11. #11

    Intezer

    AI SOC platform
    Best for forensic depth on endpoint alerts

    6.25 / 10

    Works alongside SOAR

    Beats Mate Security on: pricing transparency 5 vs 4

    Mate Security stays ahead on: investigation depth 9 vs 8, explainability 9 vs 7, human-in-the-loop controls 9 vs 6, transition effort from SOAR 9 vs 5 and deployment options 5 vs 4

    Intezer vs Mate SecurityRead the review

How do Mate Security and its top alternatives compare?

When should you stay with Mate Security?

Stay with Mate Security if translating your SOAR playbooks into Gamebooks and a staged path from Recommend only to Supervised to Auto-run are what you chose it for, and your tools are among those it supports. Mate says its guardrails run outside the agent's reasoning loop and that it falls back to Supervised mode when verdicts conflict with analyst reviews. If you need a customer-tenant or on-premises deployment, or a published price, compare the alternatives above.

Its strongest criteria on our rubric are Investigation depth per alert (9) and Explainability of verdicts (9).

Frequently asked questions

What are the best alternatives to Mate Security?

On our rubric: Cortex XSOAR (7.25), Artemis Security (7.10) and Torq AI SOC Platform (7.10). Mate Security scores 7.80. Scores are an editorial assessment of fit for replacing a playbook-based SOAR.

Is there a cheaper alternative to Mate Security?

We cannot say, because none of the twelve platforms in this guide publishes a full price list on its own site. Dropzone AI and Intezer publish a pricing unit, which makes quotes easier to compare.

Does Mate Security replace SOAR?

Mate Security's published stance, as we read it: Replaces SOAR. See the SOAR Stance Index.

Related on this site