HEAD-TO-HEAD · UPDATED 13 OCTOBER 2026 · EDITORIAL ASSESSMENT
Mate Security vs Prophet Security
Cyber AI Comparison team · Based on vendor websites, docs and funding announcements, last checked September 2026
What to know
Mate Security scores higher than Prophet Security on our SOAR replacement weights, 7.80 to 7.00. Mate Security leads on investigation depth, explainability, human-in-the-loop controls, transition effort from SOAR and pricing transparency, and Prophet Security leads on alert source coverage and deployment options. Mate Security is positioned to replace SOAR; Prophet Security is positioned to replace SOAR.
Mate Security
7.80 / 10
Prophet Security
7.00 / 10
How do Mate Security and Prophet Security compare criterion by criterion?
| Criterion | Weight | Mate Security | Prophet Security | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Investigation depth per alert | 20% | 9 | 8 | Mate Security |
| Explainability of verdicts | 15% | 9 | 8 | Mate Security |
| Coverage of alert sources | 15% | 7 | 8 | Prophet Security |
| Human-in-the-loop controls | 15% | 9 | 8 | Mate Security |
| Transition effort from an existing SOAR | 15% | 9 | 6 | Mate Security |
| Deployment model options | 10% | 5 | 6 | Prophet Security |
| Pricing transparency | 10% | 4 | 3 | Mate Security |
| Weighted score | 100% | 7.80 | 7.00 | Mate Security |
Mate Security leads on 5 criteria, Prophet Security on 2, tied on 0.
Where Mate Security loses in this comparison
- Coverage of alert sources: Mate Security 7, Prophet Security 8
- Deployment model options: Mate Security 5, Prophet Security 6
Where does each one win?
Mate Security leads on
- Investigation depth per alert: 9 vs 8. Investigates each alert against its Security Context Graph of memories, decision traces, guardrails and architecture, with domain logic for cloud, insider, email, endpoint, identity and phishing alerts.
- Explainability of verdicts: 9 vs 8. Verdicts come with an evidence trail the team can audit and tune, and decision traces record why analysts decided what they did.
- Human-in-the-loop controls: 9 vs 8. Three modes (Recommend only, Supervised, Auto-run), graduated autonomy with guardrails enforced outside the agent's reasoning loop, and rollback to Supervised when verdicts conflict with analyst reviews.
- Transition effort from an existing SOAR: 9 vs 6. States it translates existing SOAR playbooks into Gamebooks, replacing brittle API calls while keeping custom logic; the Gamebooks page is built around the SOAR comparison.
- Pricing transparency: 4 vs 3. No price page on Mate's own site; its AWS Marketplace listing shows $150,000 per 12-month contract for the "Mate Enterprise Tier", a usage tier the listing does not define.
Prophet Security leads on
- Coverage of alert sources: 7 vs 8. 200+ out-of-the-box integrations.
- Deployment model options: 5 vs 6. Single-tenant, customer data in individual datastores, bring-your-own-key option; runs on AWS with no on-premises option described.
How does pricing compare?
| Fact | Mate Security | Prophet Security |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing basis (published) | No price page on Mate's site. AWS Marketplace lists $150,000 per 12-month contract for the Mate Enterprise Tier (usage tier not defined); private offers on request. | Not published. |
| Pricing unit | Not published | Not published |
| Cost | Not published, contact sales | Not published, contact sales |
Source: AWS Marketplace: Mate Security · prophetsecurity.ai · Reviewed Sep 2026
Facts side by side
| Fact | Mate Security | Prophet Security |
|---|---|---|
| Stance | Replaces SOAR | Replaces SOAR |
| Integrations | Not published | 200+ |
| Deployment | SaaS. Mate says it is built on AWS infrastructure and sells through AWS Marketplace; its trust center lists Amazon Web Services and Google Cloud as cloud subprocessors. Self-hosted, customer-tenant and data residency options: not described. | Single-tenant on AWS; BYOK |
| Pricing | AWS Marketplace $150,000 / 12 months | Not published |
| Autonomy/response | Recommend only; Supervised (low-risk steps run, risky changes need approval); Auto-run for trusted categories under guardrails and audit. | "Scoped Agent Actions, autonomously or with your sign-off". |
Source: mate.security · mate.security/platform · mate.security/platform/gamebooks · mate.security/blog/introducing-gamebooks-can-you-script-the-whole-game · mate.security/blog/mate-security-now-available-on-aws-marketplace · mate.security/about · mate.security/newsroom · AWS Marketplace: Mate Security · Reviewed Sep 2026
Source: prophetsecurity.ai · prophetsecurity.ai/security · Reviewed Sep 2026
Which should you choose?
Choose Mate Security if transition effort from SOAR and investigation depth matter most. States it translates existing SOAR playbooks into Gamebooks, replacing brittle API calls while keeping custom logic; the Gamebooks page is built around the SOAR comparison. Investigates each alert against its Security Context Graph of memories, decision traces, guardrails and architecture, with domain logic for cloud, insider, email, endpoint, identity and phishing alerts.
Choose Prophet Security if alert source coverage and deployment options matter most. 200+ out-of-the-box integrations. Single-tenant, customer data in individual datastores, bring-your-own-key option; runs on AWS with no on-premises option described.
Frequently asked questions
Which scores higher, Mate Security or Prophet Security?
Mate Security scores 7.80 and Prophet Security 7.00 on our SOAR replacement rubric (editorial assessment, 0–10).
Do Mate Security and Prophet Security replace SOAR?
Mate Security's published stance: Replaces SOAR. Prophet Security's published stance: Replaces SOAR. See the SOAR Stance Index.
Do Mate Security and Prophet Security publish pricing?
Mate Security: No price page on Mate's site. AWS Marketplace lists $150,000 per 12-month contract for the Mate Enterprise Tier (usage tier not defined); private offers on request. Prophet Security: Not published.